Up until recently, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake lens was the only option Sony E-mount users had if they wanted a 24mm equivalent prime (35mm format) with autofocus. They don't have optical steady shot like some of the Sony lenses but really I haven't had much of a time saying to myself "I wish I had oss for this shot!". The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and Sony 16mm f/2.8 have the same focal length which equates to a 24mm equivalent field of view in 35mm terms. I'm gonna go follow you on the Gram now. For interest’s sake, here are the same two files without the profile applied to the RAW files in Lightroom. Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. Not necessarily a bad thing but if you use manual focus these are things to note. amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. I see you’re stuck between the Sigma 16mm vs 30mm f/1.4 lens for your Sony E-mount camera! There are YouTube videos out there and different comparisons. 16mm is quite wide, and it may not fit all purposes. Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. The auto focus on the Sigma 16mm does not hunt, it's very fast. amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art Wins eye AF Sharpness Equal AF speed for photos initial focus can be giddy at first with Video AF Sigma best for Photos Both have […] amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "mlscomp-nsa-20"; If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. This is mainly thanks to a massive effort from Sony but also the result of third-party manufacturers investing in the system. Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. However, the Sigma has a higher magnification (0.10x versus 0.078x). Read our detailed comparison of the Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN C to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Lens and 30mm f/1.4 DC DN Lenses are specifically designed for the Sony E-Mount APS-C crop factor cameras like the Sony A6500, A6400, and A6000 for example. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! The focus ring of the 16mm is very very loose. The differences are most striking at the fastest values (f/1.4 and f/2.8). Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. Looking more closely at the out-of-focus areas and bokeh quality, we can see that the bokeh balls produced by the Sigma between f/1.4 and f/2 are much larger and cleaner than those of the Sony at f/2.8. But I've wondered how much slower does it actually work? 8 minute mark... Dude is just like yeah. Faster aperture/wider view w Sigma vs OSS+no distortion with Sony... You can check the reviews: Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS Lens Review Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN C Lens Review Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS (SEL-35F18) - Review / Lens Test Report - Analysis Last Updated on January 12, 2021 by Melissa Teng. The Contemporary line is part of Sigma Global Vision and is the … I use manual mode because I don't like not having a say in something in the shot. The imperfections of Sony E-mount lenses, such as distortion, are either corrected in-camera or via a profile applied in your post production software. The Sony FE 35mm F1.8 is a bit less good as the background blur is sometimes more nervous and the skin rendering is more harsch; The color rendition is the best on the Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN very natural and on the Yasuhara Anthy 35mm F1.8 (very organic) followed by the Samyang 35mm F1.8 and Sony FE 35mm F1.8 Yes. I'm not worried about video because I only do photos right now. I know it's complicated but its a decent amount of money to drop so I would like to make sure I get the right one. Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. Say I purchased the 16, if I was to crop the shot down to what I wanted, how that would look or if it would look too distorted? I am not a video shooter, but liked the OSS on 35mm. do you know you are asking about two lenses with very different focal lengths? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The challenge of finding the shot without optimal light is interesting. Thank you! Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, however, and it almost completely disappears. The Sigma 16mm 1.4 DC DN Contemporary is a high performance prime with a large aperture of F1.4 designed for APS-C Mirrorless cameras including Sony E mount and Micro Four Thirds. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. If you use manual focus (which you stated you do), just note the Sony 35mm focus ring is a lot tighter than the Sigma 16mm. Thanks! The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the latter influences the look of the RAW files. *There is also a third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Samyang Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus lens. Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. Make Offer - Sigma 35mm F1.4 ART DG HSM NEW PRIME WIDE Lens for SONY CAMERA in FACTORY BOX SIGMA 35mm F1.2 DC DN SPORT PRIME LENS for SONY E NEW in FACTORY BOX & CASE $1,499.00 Still owns the 16mm because its crazy sharp and excellent low light lens. Sigma was not available. Is the new Sigma 56mm sharper than the Sony SEL50F18? Size and weight wise, we’ve found that either lens is a good match for Sony E-mount cameras, though we hardly need to point out that any camera paired with the Sony 16mm will result in a more discreet and portable combo. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. The Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art is a great value when compared to the Sony 35mm f/1.4 because it outperforms the Sony in some ways for around $700 less. 00. My gf however, uses the 16mm all the time. For me personally, that's why I use the 35mm almost all the time. Get it as soon as Fri, Feb 19. In this video I compare both lenses with real-life portraits. While offering the same high-performance optical design as other lenses in the Art line, the new E-mount models will feature a newly developed control algorithm that optimizes the autofocus drive and maximizes the data transmission speed. Don't get me wrong, the Sony lenses are solid lenses, either way you won't go wrong. I would like to stay native Sony but the 16 just seems like a solid comparable and affordable alternative. I've seen some of your videos and love your tips about a6000 set ups. amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; As always, stopping the lens down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this kind. Usually it takes on the appearance of a green orb. . However, Sigma also offers a Micro Four Thirds System version if you are not shooting Sony. Interchangeable lenses for the Sony E-mount digital camera series with full-frame image sensors are added as members of the Art line. The Sony lens may not come bundled with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the hood for the 18-55mm lens is compatible. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. The difference can be seen by looking at the two images below. amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; Different tastes and different styles. Anything and everything that has to do with capturing photos with the Sony a6000 camera. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Not necessarily a bad thing but if you use manual focus these are things to note. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. I've never used the Sigma 30m f1.4, but I've heard it's just as good as the Sony. Citing size and snappier auto focus which is a concern of mine because I don't want to be sitting there making my subject smile uncomfortably for a period of time while the camera is hunting. I prefer the Sony 35mm f1.8, but the reason is because of focal length. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. But great sharpness and size. The new Sigma 16mm F1.4 was on sale here today, so I could not resist getting it! Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. Neither is classified as weather-sealed but the Sigma benefits from a brass bayonet mount that is surrounded by a special sealing to keep dust and moisture out. The Sigma 35mm f2 DG DN is a compact prime lens designed for full-frame mirrorless cameras and, at the time of testing, available in Sony e and Leica L-mounts. Whereas the Sony peaks at around f/5.6 at the centre, the Sigma’s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Sony RX100 VI Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM +2 more Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. Press J to jump to the feed. Ethics statement: We were provided with a sample of the Sigma 16mm and bought the Sony 16mm for our personal use. The sigma 16mm 2.8 are currently my go to lens. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. So easy to carry. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. If you use manual focus (which you stated you do), just note the Sony 35mm focus ring is a lot tighter than the Sigma 16mm. amzn_assoc_title = ""; The focus ring of the 16mm is very very loose. Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. Like someone else said, 16mm and 35mm are very different focal ranges. Spent the day shooting with it, and also made a little comparison test versus the other lenses I have which can do 16mm, the Sony 10-18mm and the DT 16-50 (with LA-EA3 adapter). Bokeh will always look smoother on an overcast day vs a contrasty, sunny day. There are difference in color rendition as well. Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. That being said, because the Sony 16mm is one of the only E-mount lenses that isn’t compatible with Sony’s PDAF (phase detection autofocus) system, you may find that focusing is slower than with the Sigma, particularly when shooting moving subjects. I use the Sigma 16mm at f1.4 for all of my videos (www.youtube.com/hikyletaggart) and I've done a review on both lenses. They say the sigma lags on focus. The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. Sigma Contemporary Lens Bundle Includes Sigma 16mm f/1.4DC DN - 30mm f/1.4 DC DN - Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN for Sony E-Mount Cameras, Black $1,087.00 Get the deal (In Lightroom, you can do this by going to the Lens Corrections tab on the right.). Also for what works best in low light conditions. I have the 16 and 56 and they are nothing but fast sharp and quality lenses. Center resolution comparison between Sony 20mm f/1.8 G vs Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art @20mm: Center at f/2.8: The new Sony 20/1.8G is outstanding at center and f/2.8 and noticeably better than the Sigma zoom wide open Center at f/4: The zoom improves greatly and matches the prime. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. The new SIGMA 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary is the world’s first interchangeable lens for mirrorless Sony E-mount and Canon EOS M* cameras in the APS-C format to offer a 24mm focal length (35mm equivalent) and F1.4 brightness. ... Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony with 64GB Extreme PRO SD Card and Accessory Bundle. By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses. The focus is fantastic on them. Last updated: June 14, 2018 Go to Comments. Coming to you from Hyun Ralph Jeong, this great video review takes a look at the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary lens, available for both the Sony E mount and Leica L mount. The sigma is great, but Sony. TechnologyMafia on the Tube definitely helped and then the MFer decided to go against all the praise he gave the Sigma so now I'm just lost.