Ethical absolutists maintain that there is a single moral truth in terms of which all cultures and individuals are to be judged. Ethical absolutism is based on the idea that a single set of moral codes exists and can be universally applied to any situation in any context. Disadvantages of Absolutism 0.0 / 5. This absolute moral standard usually happens to coincide with the absolutist's own personal beliefs. Defense of Moral Absolutism I find many of the arguments against moral relativism to be very convincing, but for me, there are other reasons why I disagree with that view point, in my opinion it’s hard to reconcile where rules and boundaries come into play. There are, broadly speaking, two ways of denying moral absolutism… Defense Of Moral Absolutism : Argument Against Moral Relativism 952 Words | 4 Pages. Reletivism strengths and weaknesses. If a moral rule is right, then there would be no need to have different rules for different people because the absolute rules are universal. Complying with moral norms will surely be difficult on those occasions, but the moral norms apply nonetheless with full force, overriding all other considerations. It is fair as people are treated the same as the rules are the same for everyone. Moral Absolutism and Moral Relativism. Thus, actions are inherently moral or immoral, regardless of the beliefs and goals of the individual, society or culture that engages in the actions. Moral absolutism asserts that there are certain universal moral principles by which all peoples’ actions may be judged. American absolutists, for example, would maintain that their laws should apply to the entire world (Hinman 2002, pg.30). It allows moral rules to be evaluated critically. 0.0 / 5. moral relativism strengths and weaknesses. Strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument. The challenge with moral absolutism, however, is that there will always be strong disagreements about which moral principles are correct and which are incorrect. Start studying Reasons for, Strengths and Weaknesses of Relativism. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Moral Absolutism is the ethical belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are right or wrong, regardless of the context of the act. Another strength is that reason is used in making moral decisions. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism. 3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating. Relativism is a fairly modern perspective of ethics, although Greek philosophers dabbled in it. Moral absolutism: there are facts about which actions are right and wrong, and these facts do not depend on the perspective, opinion, or anything about the person who happens to be describing those facts. People are treated the same because the situation of an act is not taken into account, it means that everyone is right or wrong and there is no way round it. 0.0 / 5. Moral absolutism and moral relativism are essentially opposite approaches to thinking about ethics and morality. 0.0 / 5. Situation Ethics. Weaknesses Natural Law takes an absolutist and deontological view of morality. For example, most people around the world […] Advantages of Absolutism. While relativism has its strengths (it is tolerant of different points of view), its primary weakness is that it reduces ethics either to social conventions or to personal preferences. We might call this the Kantian response, after Kant’s famous hyperbole: “Better the whole people should perish,” than that injustice be done (Kant 1780, p. 100). It is a form of deontology.